What can a jury consider when deciding on punitive damages?

A jury can consider the intentions of the defendant when deciding on punitive damages because these damages are intended to punish wrongful behavior and deter similar actions in the future. If the jury believes that the defendant acted with malice, intent to cause harm, or gross negligence, they may be more inclined to award punitive damages. This aspect reflects the legal principle that punitive damages are not merely compensation for the victim but are meant to penalize the defendant for egregious conduct. The focus on the defendant's intentions allows the jury to evaluate the severity and immorality of the actions taken, which is foundational in determining whether punitive damages are warranted.

In contrast, factors like past healthcare experiences or public opinion do not directly inform the legal justification for punitive damages. The provider's negligence history may contribute to assessing liability or compensatory damages but is less relevant in the context of punitive damage considerations. Ultimately, the intentions behind the defendant's actions are central to the rationale for imposing punitive damages.